Campus Improvement Plan 2021-2022
Rummel Creek Elementary School
- Mission Statement, Vision, Core Values
- Comprehensive Needs Assessment
- Goal 1: Student Achievement
- Goal 2: Student Support
- Goal 3: Safe Schools
- Goal 4: Fiscal Responsibility
- Campus Funding Summary
Mission Statement, Vision, Core Values
Spring Branch Independent School District
Rummel Creek Elementary School
2021-2022 Campus Improvement Plan
Mission Statement
At RCE, we inspire and grow lifelong independent learners who are socially, academically, and emotionally prepared to be contributing members of society.
Vision
RCE will empower our students to become world changers who are creative, collaborative, and innovative problem solvers that succeed beyond academics, through their caring for others, while making a positive difference in the world.
Respect, Courage, Excellence, Action, Grit, Fitness & Confidence
Core Values
Every Child
We put students at the heart of everything we do.
Collective Greatness
We, as a community, leverage our individual strengths to reach challenging goals.
Collaborative Spirit
We believe in each other and find joy in our work.
Limitless Curiosity
We never stop learning and growing.
Moral Compass
We are guided by strong character, ethics and integrity.
Core Characteristics of a T-2-4 Ready Graduate
Academically Prepared: Every Child finds joy in learning, has a learner's mindset and is motivated and equipped with the knowledge, skills and competencies to succeed in life.
Ethical & Service-Minded: Every Child acts with integrity, is personally responsible for their actions and is a civically-engaged community member.
Empathetic & Self-Aware: Every Child appreciates differences, forms secure relationships and cares for their own and others’ emotional, mental and physical health.
Persistent & Adaptable: Every Child is fueled by their own passions, interests and goals and perseveres with confidence and courage.
Resourceful Problem-Solver: Every Child thinks critically and creatively and applies knowledge to find and solve problems.
Communicator & Collaborator: Every Child skillfully conveys thoughts, ideas, knowledge and information and is a receptive and responsive listener.
Comprehensive Needs Assessment
Demographics
Comprehensive Needs Assessment
Demographics
Demographics Summary
Rummel Creek Elementary School is a neighborhood school in Spring Branch Independent School District. In the 2020-2021 school year RCE had 787 students enrolled in grades PreK-5. 4.83% of students are economically disadvantaged, 12.83% are identified as Limited English Proficient (LEP) and 11.82% are classified as English as a Second Language (ESL). 1487% of students qualify as Gifted & Talented. 8.77% of students receive special education services. See the chart below for further demographic information.
Student Demographics (2019 - 2020 Fall PEIMS file loaded 05/09/2020) | Count | Percent |
Gender | ||
Female | 381 | 48.41% |
Male | 406 | 51.59% |
Ethnicity | ||
Hispanic-Latino | 138 | 17.53% |
Race | ||
American Indian - Alaskan Native | 0 | 0.00% |
Asian | 123 | 15.63% |
Black - African American | 15 | 1.91% |
Native Hawaiian - Pacific Islander | 0 | 0.00% |
White | 478 | 60.74% |
Two or More | 33 | 4.19% |
Demographics Strengths
Rummel Creek has a very low mobility rate, falling below 4% year-over-year. Most students stay at Rummel Creek throughout their elementary school years. To support English learners, all teachers at RCE are ESL certified and we have an ESL teachers assistant to provide additional, targeted supports for these students.
Problem Statements Identifying Demographics Needs
Problem Statement 1: Although the mobility rate is low and enrollment is stable at RCE, many new families are moving into the neighborhood and are not feeling connected to the school community. Root Cause: We have many multi-generational Rummel Creek families and community connections are tight and long-lasting. This can create a barrier for new families moving into the neighborhood as there are many long-standing traditions and unwritten rules that drive community involvement in and around campus.
Student Learning
Comprehensive Needs Assessment
Student Learning
Student Learning Summary
2020-2021 STAAR/MAP Data:
Grade 3 | Reading | Math | |
Approaches | 92% | 94% | |
Meets | 68% | 72% | |
Masters | 47% | 46% | |
Grade 4 | Reading | Math | Writing |
Approaches | 95% | 89% | 96% |
Meets | 79% | 89% | 83% |
Masters | 41% | 69% | 58% |
Grade 5 | Reading | Math | Science |
Approaches | 95% | 96% | 90% |
Meets | 84% | 90% | 65% |
Masters | 67% | 75% | 33% |
2020-2021 MAP Data:
BOY | MOY | EOY | ||||||
Math MAP: 2nd-5th |
% | # | % | # | % | # | ||
Did Not Meet | 7.5% | 36 | 7.1% | 33 | 6.7% | 32 | ||
Approaches | 29.4% | 141 | 30% | 140 | 21.5% | 103 | ||
Meets | 32.8% | 157 | 32.5% | 152 | 32.5% | 156 | ||
Masters | 30.3% | 145 | 30.4% | 142 | 39.4% | 189 | ||
Tested | 479 | 467 | 480 |
BOY | MOY | EOY | ||||||
Reading MAP: 2nd-5th |
% | # | % | # | % | # | ||
Did Not Meet | 7.3% | 35 | 7.3% | 34 | 7.5% | 36 | ||
Approaches | 20.9% | 100 | 22.9% | 107 | 19.7% | 95 | ||
Meets | 27.3% | 131 | 26.8% | 125 | 23.2% | 112 | ||
Masters | 44.5% | 213 | 43% | 201 | 49.7% | 240 | ||
Tested | 479 | 467 | 480 |
Student Learning Strengths
Historically Rummel Creek Elementary students perform well on standardized measures of content mastery. As there was no accountability measure associated with the STAAR tests for the 2020-2021 school year, and because the state will be moving to a fully-online assessment system in the 2022-2023 school year, the RCE team decided to take a risk and move to online testing this year. With the exception of 4th grade writing (which was taken on paper), all but a handful of students took the Reading, Math, and Science tests online. While we saw a small dip in scores as compared to historical data, overall Rummel Creek students continued to excel in this measure of academic progress.
2018-2019 Data:
Accountability Rating: A
Distinction Designations:
Academic Achievement in ELA/Reading, Academic Achievement in Mathematics, Academic Achievement in Science, Top 25 Percent: Comparative Academic Growth, Top 25 Percent: Compative Closing the Gaps, Postsecondary Readiness
84% of 3rd, 4th, and 5th grade students achieved Meets Standard on Reading STAAR. 91% of 3rd, 4th, and 5th grade students achieved Meets Standard on Math STAAR. This is a slight increase from 2017-2018 in reading and is equal to 2017-2018 in math.
Problem Statements Identifying Student Learning Needs
Problem Statement 1: Considering the high achievement level of students at Rummel Creek, the percentage of students achieving "masters" level on STAAR is remaining constant or declining, rather than increasing. Root Cause: While teachers have resources and a rich understanding of their grade level content and interventions for striving learners, there are fewer resources and strategies for extension for our high achieving student population.
School Processes & Programs
Comprehensive Needs Assessment
School Processes & Programs
School Processes & Programs Summary
Rummel Creek has a strong team of interventionists and instructional specialists who support students alongside their grade level teachers. Students also have opportunities for extension both within their classroom and through the Spiral and Math Movers programs. Rummel Creek has a rigorous screening and interview process for new hires, and interviews are conducted by committees. We are fortunate to have two assistant principals in addition to the principal, which allows for more interaction with both students and teachers throughout the school day. The master schedule has protected time for grade level teams to meet as professional learning teams, as well as "What I Need" (WIN) Time during the school day. During WIN Time first instruction pauses and all students get what they need, whether that be a pull-out intervention or extension, an extra reading or math small group with a grade level teacher, or social-emotional supports. This is one of the strategies we utilize to ensure high levels of learning for all students.
School Processes & Programs Strengths
Teacher teams work closely together to design instruction for their students. Teachers in grades 3-5 are departmentalized to allow teachers to become experts in 1-2 content areas. Rummel Creek is a destination campus for both new and veteran teachers, which gives us the benefit of having a rich pool of highly-qualified applicants for all open positions.
Problem Statements Identifying School Processes & Programs Needs
Problem Statement 1: Meeting the needs of all students is our collectively responsibility. Teacher teams must work collaboratively and creatively to meet the learning needs of all students at Rummel Creek. Root Cause: The health and safety guidelines associated with the COVID-19 pandemic during the 2020-2021 school year limited our teachers ability to share students across classrooms during WIN Time to ensure the learning needs of all students were met. Teachers are planning for ways to maximize this time in the 2021-2022 school year.
Perceptions
Comprehensive Needs Assessment
Perceptions
Perceptions Summary
Rummel Creek is known for having a warm and welcoming atmosphere. Even though community access to campus was severly limited during the 2020-2021 school year, due to the COVID-19 pandemic, students reported feeling nurtured and cared for on campus. Teachers, staff, and administrators worked hard to reach families through other measures such as virtual meetings, phone calls, and emails. While not the same and in-person interactions, RCE staff worked hard to help families continue to feel connected to our school. Students, teachers, staff, and parents report feeling a family atmosphere when entering school grounds. We have a highly professional staff at RCE. Overall, the staff is positive and hard working. We have many different assessments and surveys to help drive our instruction and meet students' needs. This year, we will continue administering the MAP test which provides us with student growth data three times per school year in Reading and Math. The strong majority of staff, parents, and students report feeling that the school holds rigorous expectations and there is a focus on core values and safety.
Perceptions Strengths
Rummel Creek has a very positive reputation within the community and district. There are many second-generation families currently attending RCE, and there are even several RCE alumni that now work on the campus. Students and parents report feeling supported by the staff on campus, and the perception data around communication is very favorable.
Problem Statements Identifying Perceptions Needs
Problem Statement 1: RCE had many front office personnel changes in the 2020-2021 school year, including a new principal, and families and the community had limited access to the campus due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Helping the community feel connected to these new staff members will need to be a priority as the campus opens in the 2021-2022 school year. Root Cause: The front office staff are the first points of contact for the community. Having many new members to that team during a year when the public did not have access to the campus created some communication barriers that will need to be addressed going forward.
Data Documentation
Comprehensive Needs Assessment Data Documentation
The following data were used to verify the comprehensive needs assessment analysis:
Improvement Planning Data
- District goals
- Campus goals
- HB3 CCMR goals
- Performance Objectives with summative review (prior year)
- Campus/District improvement plans (current and prior years)
- State and federal planning requirements
- Covid-19 Factors and/or waivers
Accountability Data
- Texas Academic Performance Report (TAPR) data
- Student Achievement Domain
- Student Progress Domain
- Closing the Gaps Domain
- Community Based Accountability System (CBAS)
Student Data: Assessments
- State and federally required assessment information
- (STAAR) current and longitudinal results, including all versions
- Texas English Language Proficiency Assessment System (TELPAS) and TELPAS Alternate results
- Student Success Initiative (SSI) data for Grades 5 and 8
- Local benchmark or common assessments data
- Running Records results
- Texas approved PreK - 2nd grade assessment data
Student Data: Student Groups
- Race and ethnicity data, including number of students, academic achievement, discipline, attendance, and progress
- Special programs data, including number of students, academic achievement, discipline, attendance, and progress
- Economically Disadvantaged / Non-economically disadvantaged performance, progress, and participation data
- Male / Female performance, progress, and participation data
- Special education/non-special education population including discipline, progress and participation data
- At-risk/non-at-risk population including performance, progress, discipline, attendance, and mobility data
- EL/non-EL or LEP data, including academic achievement, progress, support and accommodation needs, race, ethnicity, gender, etc.
- Section 504 data
- Homeless data
- Gifted and talented data
- Dyslexia Data
- Response to Intervention (RtI) student achievement data
Student Data: Behavior and Other Indicators
- Attendance data
- Mobility rate, including longitudinal data
- Discipline records
- Student surveys and/or other feedback
- Class size averages by grade and subject
- School safety data
Employee Data
- Professional learning communities (PLC) data
- Staff surveys and/or other feedback
- Teacher/Student Ratio
- State certified and high quality staff data
- Campus leadership data
- Campus department and/or faculty meeting discussions and data
- Professional development needs assessment data
- Evaluation(s) of professional development implementation and impact
Parent/Community Data
- Parent surveys and/or other feedback
- Parent engagement rate
- Community surveys and/or other feedback
Support Systems and Other Data
- Organizational structure data
- Processes and procedures for teaching and learning, including program implementation
- Communications data
- Budgets/entitlements and expenditures data
Goal 1: Student Achievement
Student Achievement
- Performance Objective 1 - ACHIEVEMENT
- Performance Objective 2 - EARLY LITERACY
- Performance Objective 3 - GAP-CLOSING
- Performance Objective 4 - STUDENT GROWTH
- Performance Objective 5 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ACQUISITION PROGRESS
Performance Objective 1 - ACHIEVEMENT
Goals
Goal 1: STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT. Every Rummel Creek Elementary School student will master rigorous academic standards to ensure college and career readiness.
Performance Objective 1: ACHIEVEMENT: By June 2022, Rummel Creek Elementary School will increase student performance on STAAR Grades 3-5 exams in reading and math by at least 3 points at each performance level (approaches, meets, masters).
2020-21: Reading: 94% (approaches), 77% (meets), 52% (masters); Math: 96% (approaches), 84% (meets), 64% (masters)
2019-20: Not Rated due to COVID
2018-19: Reading: 97% (approaches), 84% (meets), 60% (masters); Math: 99% (approaches), 91% (meets), 77% (masters)
2017-18: Reading: 96% (approaches), 83% (meets), 55% (masters); Math: 99% (approaches), 91% (meets), 64% (masters)
Evaluation Data Sources: STAAR 3-8 Reports
Summative Evaluation: None
Strategy 1: During August professional learning teachers will look closely at data from the 2020-2021 school year, including STAAR, MAP, and Running Record data with their grade level and vertical teams to strategically plan for instruction at the start of the school year. Strategy's Expected Result/Impact: More effective PLC functioning, improved academic outcomes for students Staff Responsible for Monitoring: Principal, Assistant Principals, Interventionists, Classroom Teachers Funding Sources: instructional resources and supplies - 199 PIC 99 - Undistributed - $1,000 |
Strategy 2: At the start of the school year, teachers will identify essential standards for their grade level, guided by the support of district specialists and administration, as well as feedback from the grade level teams above and below them. Strategy's Expected Result/Impact: A more focused and streamlined curriculum and more effective closing of post- COVID learning gaps Staff Responsible for Monitoring: Principal, Assistant Principals, Instructional Specialists, Classroom Teachers Funding Sources: Specialized training and support for ensuring growth in all learners - 199 PIC 99 - Undistributed - $1,000 |
Strategy 3: During a specified daily protected time, RCE teachers and specialists will provide Tier II or III instruction to students according to their needs without sacrificing crucial Tier I instructional time. Teachers will determine student needs during weekly PLC discussions. Strategy's Expected Result/Impact: Increased academic performance of all students Staff Responsible for Monitoring: Principal, Assistant Principals, Instructional Specialists, Interventionists, Classroom Teachers Funding Sources: Instructional materials such as TCRWP consumables - 199 PIC 99 - Undistributed - $3,000 |
Strategy 4: Teachers will meet weekly as a PLC to review instructional data, plan common assessments, and determine student needs with the support of administration and instructional specialists. Strategy's Expected Result/Impact: Increased academic performance of all students Staff Responsible for Monitoring: Principal, Assistant Principals, Interventionists, Classroom Teachers Funding Sources: TCRWP Consumable Materials and Math resources - 199 PIC 99 - Undistributed - $3,000 |
Performance Objective 2 - EARLY LITERACY
Goals
Goal 2: EARLY LITERACY: By June 2022, Rummel Creek Elementary School will increase the combined % of students reading On Grade Level or Above Grade Level on the End-of-Year Running Records assessment in each primary grade, K, 1, and 2, by 2 percentage points or ≥ to 85%.
2020-21: Kindergarten 98% On Grade Level or Above Grade Level; 1st Grade: 87% On Grade Level or Above Grade Level; 2nd Grade: 92% On Grade Level or Above Grade Level
Evaluation Data Sources: Running Records End-of-Year Report
Summative Evaluation: None
Strategy 1: Provide additional training to teachers in grades K, 1, and 2 on the implementation of effective strategies for small group instruction. Strategy's Expected Result/Impact: Increase the percentage of students reading on grade level by the end of 2nd grade. Staff Responsible for Monitoring: Principal, Assistant Principals, Interventionists, Instructional Specialists, Teachers Funding Sources: Substitute teachers to allow time for teachers to attend professional learning - 199 PIC 11 - Instructional Services - $8,000, Materials for teachers to utilize during professional learning and in classrooms - 199 PIC 99 - Undistributed - $1,200 |
Strategy 2: During a specified daily protected time, RCE teachers and specialists will provide Tier II or III instruction to students according to their needs without sacrificing crucial Tier I instructional time. Teachers will determine student needs during weekly PLC discussions. Strategy's Expected Result/Impact: Increased academic performance of all students Staff Responsible for Monitoring: Principal, Assistant Principals, Instructional Specialists, Interventionists, Classroom Teachers |
Strategy 3: Teachers will meet weekly as a PLC to review instructional data, plan common assessments, and determine student needs with the support of administration and instructional specialists. Strategy's Expected Result/Impact: Increased academic performance of all students Staff Responsible for Monitoring: Principal, Assistant Principals, Interventionists, Classroom Teachers |
Strategy 4: Utilize interventionists, dedicated substitutes, teacher assistants, and volunteers to help teachers ensure all students are getting individualized and/or small group instruction several times each week at their instructional level. Strategy's Expected Result/Impact: At least one year's growth for all readers in grades K, 1, and 2. Staff Responsible for Monitoring: Principal, Assistant Principals, Interventionists, Teachers |
Strategy 5: Grade level teams and vertical teams will meet twice per year to identify essential standards, create common assessments, review data, and plan for intervention/extension. Strategy's Expected Result/Impact: At least one year's worth of growth for all students. Staff Responsible for Monitoring: Teachers, Interventionists, Assistant Principals, Principal Funding Sources: Substitutes for planning days - 199 PIC 11 - Instructional Services - $13,200 |
Strategy 6: Provide time for Kindergarten and 1st grade teachers to assess and intervene for striving readers. Strategy's Expected Result/Impact: All students will end the year on or above grade level in reading. Funding Sources: Substitutes to allow teachers time to work 1:1 with students for assessment and intervention - 199 PIC 11 - Instructional Services - $3,000 |
Performance Objective 3 - GAP-CLOSING
Goals
Goal 1: STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT. Every Rummel Creek Elementary School student will master rigorous academic standards to ensure college and career readiness.
Performance Objective 3: GAP-CLOSING: By June 2022, Rummel Creek Elementary School will increase overall performance on STAAR Grades 3-5 exams to narrow the gap or improve performance above the target by at least 4 percentage points for English Learners.
2020-21: English Learners 63%; non-English Learners 77%
2019-20: Not Rated due to COVID
Evaluation Data Sources: State Accountability Reports
Summative Evaluation: None
Strategy 1: RCE teachers will participate in professional learning focused on ELPS and effective ESL instructional strategies. Strategy's Expected Result/Impact: Increased usage of ESL strategies in all classrooms, increased academic performance of EL students Staff Responsible for Monitoring: Principal, Assistant Principals, Classroom Teachers Funding Sources: Consumables for ESL intervention - 199 PIC 25 - ESL/Bilingual - $100, Consumables for ESL intervention - 199 PIC 99 - Undistributed - $2,000 |
Strategy 2: Classroom teachers will work with the ESL paraprofessional to determine student needs and collaborate to provide support both within the classroom and during the protected RTI time. Strategy's Expected Result/Impact: More effective use of the ESL support paraprofessional and increased support of EL students at the beginner and intermediate level Staff Responsible for Monitoring: Principal, Assistant Principals, ESL Support, Paraprofessional Classroom Teachers Funding Sources: Consumable resources for ESL intervention - 199 PIC 25 - ESL/Bilingual - $1,000 |
Strategy 3: Utilize interventionists, dedicated substitutes, teacher assistants, and volunteers to help teachers ensure all EL students are getting individualized and/or small group instruction several times each week at their instructional level. Strategy's Expected Result/Impact: Increased academic performance of all EL students Staff Responsible for Monitoring: Principal, Assistant Principals, ESL Support, Paraprofessional Classroom Teachers, Teacher Assistants, Interventionists |
Performance Objective 4 - STUDENT GROWTH
Goals
Goal 1: STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT. Every Rummel Creek Elementary School student will master rigorous academic standards to ensure college and career readiness.
Performance Objective 4: STUDENT GROWTH: By June 2022, Rummel Creek Elementary School will increase the % of students who meet or exceed conditional growth index (CGI) targets on Measures of Academic Progress: Reading (K-5) increase by 5 points, Math (K-5) increase by 5 points.
2020-21: Reading - 53% met CGI; Math - 64% met CGI
2019-20: Not Rated due to COVID
2018-19: Reading - 67% met CGI; Math - 69% met CGI
2017-18: Reading - 62% met CGI; Math - 68% met CGI
Evaluation Data Sources: Measures of Academic Progress (MAP) Reports
Summative Evaluation: None
Strategy 1: Following the administration of the BOY and MOY MAP assessments, teachers will review Reading and Math data with their grade level PLCs and develop a plan to address student needs. Strategy's Expected Result/Impact: Increased % of students meeting CGI at EOY Staff Responsible for Monitoring: Principal, Assistant Principals, Instructional Specialists, Classroom Teachers Funding Sources: Targeted intervention resources for students receiving special education services - 199 PIC 23 - Special Education - $1,410, Substitutes to allow teachers to attend professional learning to address individual student needs through small group instruction. - 199 PIC 11 - Instructional Services - $3,400, Resources for teachers to utilize during small group instruction in reading and math. - 199 PIC 99 - Undistributed - $1,000 |
Strategy 2: Language arts teachers will utilize the Teacher's College curriculum and periodic running records to ensure that all students achieve literacy learning targets. Strategy's Expected Result/Impact: Increased reading and writing performance for all students. Staff Responsible for Monitoring: Principal, Assistant Principals, Reading Specialists, Language Arts Teachers Funding Sources: Substitutes to allow teachers to attend professional learning and planning sessions - 199 PIC 11 - Instructional Services - $2,000, TC resources to be utilized during instruction - 199 PIC 99 - Undistributed - $2,000 |
Strategy 3: Provide additional training for all classroom teachers on the reports and resources available within the NWEA MAP program to ensure they are monitoring student progress toward meeting CGI. Strategy's Expected Result/Impact: Increase the number of students at all grade levels meeting their CGI target. Staff Responsible for Monitoring: Principal, Assistant Principal, Interventionists, Literacy Instructional Specialist, District Assessment Staff, Classroom Teachers Funding Sources: Substitutes for language arts teachers to analyze data and plan for instruction - 199 PIC 11 - Instructional Services - $735 |
Performance Objective 5 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ACQUISITION PROGRESS
Goals
Goal 1: STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT. Every Rummel Creek Elementary School student will master rigorous academic standards to ensure college and career readiness.
Performance Objective 5: ENGLISH LANGUAGE ACQUISITION PROGRESS: By June 2022, the rate of English Learners increasing at least one Composite Score level will increase by 10 percentage points or ≥ 80%.
2020-21: TELPAS Progress Rate 78%
2019-20: Not Rated due to COVID
Evaluation Data Sources: State Accountability Report Domain 3
Summative Evaluation: None
Strategy 1: Teachers and ESL paraprofessional will collaborate around data for English Learners to provide targeted small group instruction to each student. Strategy's Expected Result/Impact: The percentage of English Learners reclassifying will increase. Staff Responsible for Monitoring: Principal, Assistant Principals, ESL Paraprofessionals, Teachers Funding Sources: Resources for targeted small group instruction for English Learners - 199 PIC 25 - ESL/Bilingual - $1,000 |
Strategy 2: Utilize interventionists, dedicated substitutes, teacher assistants, and volunteers to help teachers ensure all EL students are getting individualized and/or small group instruction several times each week at their instructional level. Strategy's Expected Result/Impact: Increased academic performance of all EL students. Staff Responsible for Monitoring: Principal, Assistant Principal, Interventionists, Classroom Teachers, Teacher Assistants Funding Sources: Substitute Teachers to allow time for additional intervention for EL students - 199 PIC 11 - Instructional Services - $2,000 |
Goal 2: Student Support
Student Support
Performance Objective 1 - SCHOOL CONNECTEDNESS
Goals
Goal 2: STUDENT SUPPORT. Every Rummel Creek Elementary School student will benefit from an aligned system that supports his/her academic and social-emotional needs.
Performance Objective 1: SCHOOL CONNECTEDNESS: By June 2022, the % of Rummel Creek Elementary School students who feel connected as both individuals and learners will increase by at least 5 precentage points.
2020-21: School Belonging: 69% Rigorous Expectations: 80% Teacher-Student Relationships: 73%
2019-20: Not Rated due to COVID
2018-19 (Spring): School Belonging: 78% Rigorous Expectations: 89% Teacher-Student Relationships: 81%
2017-18 (Spring): School Belonging: 76% Rigorous Expectations: 84% Teacher-Student Relationships: 78%
Evaluation Data Sources: Panorama Student Survey
Summative Evaluation: None
Strategy 1: Teachers and staff will create a sense of community within each classroom and across the campus, utilizing community circles, collaboratively developed behavior expectations, the PurposeFull People curriculum, the Panorama Playbook, and other district recommended activities, such as No Place for Hate. Strategy's Expected Result/Impact: Increase in end of year Panorama scores within the targeted areas Staff Responsible for Monitoring: Principal, Assistant Principals, Counselor, Librarian, Classroom Teachers Funding Sources: Posters & consumables for guidance lessons - 199 PIC 24 - At Risk - $820, Posters & consumables for guidance lessons - 199 PIC 99 - Undistributed - $840 |
Strategy 2: Teachers and staff will demonstrate high expectations for all students, regardless of socio-economic status, native language, or learning disability, by encouraging them to achieve their full potential and seeking increasingly effective methods of instruction utilizing Response to Intervention. Strategy's Expected Result/Impact: A narrowing of the gap between FRPL, EL, or sped students and those not classified as such in response to rigorous expectation questions on the Panorama survey Staff Responsible for Monitoring: Principal, Assistant Principals, Counselor, Librarian, Classroom Teachers |
Performance Objective 2 - GUIDANCE AND COUNSELING
Goals
Goal 2: STUDENT SUPPORT. Every Rummel Creek Elementary School student will benefit from an aligned system that supports his/her academic and social-emotional needs.
Performance Objective 2: GUIDANCE AND COUNSELING: Each grade level will implement and support character education and social-emotional learning curriculum.
Evaluation Data Sources: Training materials and attendance rosters
Summative Evaluation: None
Strategy 1: The counselor, supported by administration and key teacher leaders, will lead students and staff in the implementation of the PurposeFull People Curriculum at RCE through classroom guidance lessons, campus-wide activities, and specific strategies shared during faculty meetings and professional development time. Strategy's Expected Result/Impact: A campus wide focus on character and social-emotional wellness Staff Responsible for Monitoring: Principal, Assistant Principals, Counselor >Funding Sources: Consumable resources for guidance lessons - 199 PIC 99 - Undistributed - $1,000 |
Strategy 2: Redistribute responsibilities traditionally assigned to the school counselor to allow more time for guidance lessons and working with students. Strategy's Expected Result/Impact: Counselor will have significantly more time to dedicate to guidance lessons and counseling by being freed up from the responsibilities of GT and CBE testing. Staff Responsible for Monitoring: Principal, Assistant Principals, Counselor, Teacher, leaders invited to attend the PD Funding Sources: Substitutes for interventionists to facilitate and coordinate GT and CBE testing - 199 PIC 11 - Instructional Services - $1,000 |
Goal 3: Safe Schools
Safe Schools
- Performance Objective 1 - SAFETY COMMITTEE
- Performance Objective 2 - EMERGENCY OPERATIONS
- Performance Objective 3
Performance Objective 1 - SAFETY COMMITTEE
Goals
Goal 3: SAFE SCHOOLS. Strengthen school safety by establishing and conducting Campus Safety Committee reviews throughout the school year.
Performance Objective 1: SAFETY COMMITTEE: Strengthen school safety by establishing and conducting Campus Safety Committee reviews throughout the school year.
Evaluation Data Sources: Campus Safety Committee roster
Summative Evaluation: None
Strategy 1: CAMPUS SAFETY COMMITTEE: Establish Campus Safety Committees composed of a cross section of stakeholders to look at matters related to campus safety. Strategy's Expected Result/Impact: Each Campus principal will recruit a safety team and provide a roster. Each campus team will meet three times per year so that all campuses will be able to refine safety practices. Staff Responsible for Monitoring: Administrators |
Strategy 2: HARRIS COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION: Participate in the Harris County Department of Education (HCDE) campus safety audit. Strategy's Expected Result/Impact: Campus will develop action plans to address any deficiencies as a result of safety audits. Staff Responsible for Monitoring: Administrators, Safety Committee |
Performance Objective 2 - EMERGENCY OPERATIONS
Goals
Goal 3: SAFE SCHOOLS. Strengthen school safety by establishing and conducting Campus Safety Committee reviews throughout the school year.
Performance Objective 2: EMERGENCY OPERATIONS: Develop Campus Emergency Operations Procedures (EOP) that comply with SB 11, and include Standard Operating Procedures.
Evaluation Data Sources: Campus Emergency Operation Procedures Documents
Summative Evaluation: None
Strategy 1: EMERGENCY OPERATIONS PROCEDURES: Campus EOP will align to the best practices from the Texas School Safety Center and the Standard Operating Procedures, such as the "I Love You Guys" Foundation. Strategy's Expected Result/Impact: Campus EOP is turned in and filed by September 1st. Staff Responsible for Monitoring: Administrators |
Strategy 2: EMERGENCY OPERATIONS PROCEDURES: Update campus EOP annually and train staff at the start of each school year. Strategy's Expected Result/Impact: Campus procedures maintained in campus EOPs. Staff training documents maintained. EOP submitted by September 1st. Staff Responsible for Monitoring: Administrators, Safety Committee |
Performance Objective 3
Goal 3: SAFE SCHOOLS. Strengthen school safety by establishing and conducting Campus Safety Committee reviews throughout the school year.
Performance Objective 3: Utilize PPE to minimize the spread of bacteria and viruses on campus.
Evaluation Data Sources: Reduce the number of illness-related absences over the course of the year.
Strategy 1: Ensure teachers have access to PPE in all classrooms
Staff Responsible for Monitoring: Campus Safety Officer Principal
Funding Sources: PPE (hand sanitizer, sanitizing wipes, masks, etc) - 199 PIC 99 - Undistributed - $10,000
Goal 4: Fiscal Responsibility
Fiscal Responsibility
Performance Objective 1 - FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT
Goals
Goal 4: FISCAL RESPONSIBILITY. Rummel Creek Elementary School will ensure efficient and effective fiscal management of resources and operations to maximize learning for all students.
Performance Objective 1: FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT: Maintain high quality financial management practices so that financial resources provide the maximum possible support for T-2-4.
Evaluation Data Sources: Year-To-Date (YTD) Budget Reports (monthly, quarterly, annually)
Summative Evaluation: None
Strategy 1: Conduct frequent budget meetings with Administrative Assistant to review and manage money. Strategy's Expected Result/Impact: Error free records. Documentation of purchases and orders. Staff Responsible for Monitoring: Principal, Administrative Assistant Title I Schoolwide Elements: 3.1 |
Campus Funding Summary
Campus Funding Summary
199 PIC 11 - Instructional Services | ||||
Goal | Objective | Strategy | Resources Needed | Amount |
1 | 2 | 1 | Substitute teachers to allow time for teachers to attend professional learning | $8,000.00 |
1 | 2 | 5 | Substitutes for planning days | $13,200.00 |
1 | 2 | 6 | Substitutes to allow teachers time to work 1:1 with students for assessment and intervention |
$3,000.00 |
1 | 4 | 1 | Substitutes to allow teachers to attend professional learning to address individual student needs through small group instruction. | $3,400.00 |
1 | 4 | 2 | Substitutes to allow teachers to attend professional learning and planning sessions |
$2,000.00 |
1 | 4 | 3 | Substitutes for language arts teachers to analyze data and plan for instruction | $735.00 |
1 | 5 | 2 | Substitute Teachers to allow time for additional intervention for EL students | $2,000.00 |
2 | 2 | 2 | Substitutes for interventionists to facilitate and coordinate GT and CBE testing | $1,000.00 |
Sub-Total | $33,335.00 | |||
Budgeted Fund Source Amount | $33,335.00 | |||
+/- Difference | $0.00 |
199 PIC 23 - Special Education | ||||
Goal | Objective | Strategy | Resources Needed | Amount |
1 | 4 | 1 | Targeted intervention resources for students receiving special education services | $1,410.00 |
Sub-Total | $1,410.00 | |||
Budgeted Fund Source Amount | $1,410.00 | |||
+/- Difference | $0.00 |
199 PIC 24 - At Risk | ||||
Goal | Objective | Strategy | Resources Needed | Amount |
2 | 1 | 1 | Posters & consumables for guidance lessons | $820.00 |
Sub-Total | $820.00 | |||
Budgeted Fund Source Amount | $820.00 | |||
+/- Difference | $0.00 |
199 PIC 25 - ESL/Bilingual | ||||
Goal | Objective | Strategy | Resources Needed | Amount |
1 | 3 | 1 | Consumables for ESL intervention | $100.00 |
1 | 3 | 2 | Consumable resources for ESL intervention | $1000.00 |
1 | 5 | 1 | Resources for targeted small group instruction for English Learners | $1000.00 |
Sub-Total | $2,100.00 | |||
Budgeted Fund Source Amount | $2,100.00 | |||
+/- Difference | $0.00 |
199 PIC 99 - Undistributed | ||||
Goal | Objective | Strategy | Resources Needed | Amount |
1 | 1 | 1 | Instructional resources and supplies | $1,000.00 |
1 | 1 | 2 | Specialized training and support for ensuring growth in all learners | $1,000.00 |
1 | 1 | 3 | Instructional materials such as TCRWP consumables | $3,000.00 |
1 | 1 | 4 | TCRWP Consumable Materials and Math resources | $3,000.00 |
1 | 2 | 1 | Materials for teachers to utilize during professional learning and in classrooms | $1,200.00 |
1 | 3 | 1 | Consumables for ESL intervention | $2,000.00 |
1 | 4 | 1 | Resources for teachers to utilize during small group instruction in reading and math. |
$1,000.00 |
1 | 4 | 2 | TC resources to be utilized during instruction | $2,000.00 |
2 | 1 | 1 | Posters & consumables for guidance lessons | $840.00 |
2 | 2 | 1 | Consumable resources for guidance lessons | $1,000.00 |
3 | 3 | 1 | PPE (hand sanitizer, sanitizing wipes, masks, etc) | $10,000.00 |
Sub-Total | $26,040.00 | |||
Budgeted Fund Source Amount | $26,140.00 | |||
+/- Difference | $0.00 | |||
Grand Total | $63,705.00 |