Campus Improvement Plan 2022-2023
Rummel Creek Elementary School
- Mission Statement, Vision, Core Values
- Comprehensive Needs Assessment
- Goal 1: Student Achievement
- Goal 2: Student Support
- Goal 3: Safe Schools
- Goal 4: Fiscal Responsibility
- Campus Funding Summary
Mission Statement, Vision, Core Values
Spring Branch Independent School District
Rummel Creek Elementary School
2022-2023 Campus Improvement Plan
Mission Statement
At RCE, we inspire and grow lifelong independent learners who are socially, academically, and emotionally prepared to be contributing members of society.
Vision
RCE will empower our students to become world changers who are creative, collaborative, and innovative problem solvers that succeed beyond academics, through their caring for others, while making a positive difference in the world.
Respect, Courage, Excellence, Action, Grit, Fitness & Confidence
Core Values
Every Child: We put students at the heart of everything we do.
Collective Greatness: We, as a community, leverage our individual strengths to reach challenging goals.
Collaborative Spirit: We believe in each other and find joy in our work.
Limitless Curiosity: We never stop learning and growing.
Moral Compass: We are guided by strong character, ethics and integrity.
Core Characteristics of a T-2-4 Ready Graduate
Academically Prepared: Every Child finds joy in learning, has a learner's mindset and is motivated and equipped with the knowledge, skills and competencies to succeed in life.
Ethical & Service-Minded: Every Child acts with integrity, is personally responsible for their actions and is a civically-engaged community member.
Empathetic & Self-Aware: Every Child appreciates differences, forms secure relationships and cares for their own and others’ emotional, mental and physical health.
Persistent & Adaptable: Every Child is fueled by their own passions, interests and goals and perseveres with confidence and courage.
Resourceful Problem-Solver: Every Child thinks critically and creatively and applies knowledge to find and solve problems.
Communicator & Collaborator: Every Child skillfully conveys thoughts, ideas, knowledge and information and is a receptive and responsive listener.
Comprehensive Needs Assessment
Demographics
Comprehensive Needs Assessment
Demographics
Demographics Summary
Rummel Creek Elementary School is a neighborhood school in Spring Branch Independent School District. In the 2020-2021 school year RCE had 787 students enrolled in grades PreK-5. 4.83% of students are economically disadvantaged, 12.83% are identified as Limited English Proficient (LEP) and 11.82% are classified as English as a Second Language (ESL). 1487% of students qualify as Gifted & Talented. 8.77% of students receive special education services. See the chart below for further demographic information.
Student Demographics (2019 - 2020 Fall PEIMS file loaded 05/09/2020) | Count | Percent |
Gender | ||
Female | 381 | 48.41% |
Male | 406 | 51.59% |
Ethnicity | ||
Hispanic-Latino | 138 | 17.53% |
Race | ||
American Indian - Alaskan Native | 0 | 0.00% |
Asian | 123 | 15.63% |
Black - African American | 15 | 1.91% |
Native Hawaiian - Pacific Islander | 0 | 0.00% |
White | 478 | 60.74% |
Two or More | 33 | 4.19% |
Demographics Strengths
Rummel Creek has a very low mobility rate, falling below 4% year-over-year. Most students stay at Rummel Creek throughout their elementary school years. To support English learners, all teachers at RCE are ESL certified and we have an ESL teachers assistant to provide additional, targeted supports for these students.
Problem Statements Identifying Demographics Needs
Problem Statement 1: The percentage of Emergent Bilingual students scoring approaches or higher on the reading STAAR test continues to be lower than the percentage of non-EL students scoring approaches or higher. On the Reading STAAR test in the 2021-2022 school year 76% of Emergent Bilingual students scored approaches or better compared to 96% of non-EL students scoring approaches or better.
Root Cause: While many of our Emergent Bilingual students are high achieving, we do not have extensive resources for providing targeted instruction, and the only direct services are provided by a 1/2 time paraprofessional.
Student Learning
Comprehensive Needs Assessment
Student Learning
Student Learning Summary
2020-2021 STAAR/MAP Data:
Grade 3 | Reading | Math | |
Approaches | 92% | 94% | |
Meets | 68% | 72% | |
Masters | 47% | 46% | |
Grade 4 | Reading | Math | Writing |
Approaches | 95% | 89% | 96% |
Meets | 79% | 89% | 83% |
Masters | 41% | 69% | 58% |
Grade 5 | Reading | Math | Science |
Approaches | 95% | 96% | 90% |
Meets | 84% | 90% | 65% |
Masters | 67% | 75% | 33% |
2020-2021 MAP Data:
BOY | MOY | EOY | ||||||
Math MAP: 2nd-5th |
% | # | % | # | % | # | ||
Did Not Meet | 7.5% | 36 | 7.1% | 33 | 6.7% | 32 | ||
Approaches | 29.4% | 141 | 30% | 140 | 21.5% | 103 | ||
Meets | 32.8% | 157 | 32.5% | 152 | 32.5% | 156 | ||
Masters | 30.3% | 145 | 30.4% | 142 | 39.4% | 189 | ||
Tested | 479 | 467 | 480 |
BOY | MOY | EOY | ||||||
Reading MAP: 2nd-5th |
% | # | % | # | % | # | ||
Did Not Meet | 7.3% | 35 | 7.3% | 34 | 7.5% | 36 | ||
Approaches | 20.9% | 100 | 22.9% | 107 | 19.7% | 95 | ||
Meets | 27.3% | 131 | 26.8% | 125 | 23.2% | 112 | ||
Masters | 44.5% | 213 | 43% | 201 | 49.7% | 240 | ||
Tested | 479 | 467 | 480 |
Student Learning Strengths
Historically Rummel Creek Elementary students perform well on standardized measures of content mastery. As there was no accountability measure associated with the STAAR tests for the 2020-2021 school year, and because the state will be moving to a fully-online assessment system in the 2022-2023 school year, the RCE team decided to take a risk and move to online testing this year. With the exception of 4th grade writing (which was taken on paper), all but a handful of students took the Reading, Math, and Science tests online. While we saw a small dip in scores as compared to historical data, overall Rummel Creek students continued to excel in this measure of academic progress.
2018-2019 Data:
Accountability Rating: A
Distinction Designations:
Academic Achievement in ELA/Reading, Academic Achievement in Mathematics, Academic Achievement in Science, Top 25 Percent: Comparative Academic Growth, Top 25 Percent: Compative Closing the Gaps, Postsecondary Readiness
84% of 3rd, 4th, and 5th grade students achieved Meets Standard on Reading STAAR. 91% of 3rd, 4th, and 5th grade students achieved Meets Standard on Math STAAR. This is a slight increase from 2017-2018 in reading and is equal to 2017-2018 in math.
Problem Statements Identifying Student Learning Needs
Problem Statement 1: Considering the high achievement level of students at Rummel Creek, the percentage of students achieving "masters" level on STAAR is remaining constant or declining, rather than increasing.
Root Cause: While teachers have resources and a rich understanding of their grade level content and interventions for striving learners, there are fewer resources and strategies for extension for our high achieving student population.
Problem Statement 2: English learners and students receiving special education services are performing at rates lower than other student populations.
Root Cause: Teachers need additional training on how to support and intervene for English language learners and students receiving special education services.
Problem Statement 3: While our community is highly involved on our campus, for many parents this involvement is focused around events or performances, rather than instruction and/or learning.
Root Cause: Due to the COVID-19 pandemic visitors and volunteers were removed from the school building for more than a year. During the 2021-2022 school year we were so excited to welcome them back in and get back to "normal," but were not intentional about planning events that focused on learning.
Problem Statement 4: Now that RCE is 1:1 with student devices, we are looking for ways to leverage technology most effectively without overdoing the screen time for students.
Root Cause: When teachers were planning instruction that could "flip virtual overnight" they relied heavily on technology to ensure student access. Moving back to using it only as a tool to enhance learning requires intentionality.
Problem Statement 5: Professional Learning Communities must be committed to continuous cycles of improvement to improve student outcomes.
Root Cause: Rummel Creek is in the initiating and implementing stages of our PLC journey.
School Processes & Programs
Comprehensive Needs Assessment
School Processes & Programs
School Processes & Programs Summary
Rummel Creek has a strong team of interventionists and instructional specialists who support students alongside their grade level teachers. Students also have opportunities for extension both within their classroom and through the Spiral and Math Movers programs. Rummel Creek has a rigorous screening and interview process for new hires, and interviews are conducted by committees. We are fortunate to have two assistant principals in addition to the principal, which allows for more interaction with both students and teachers throughout the school day. The master schedule has protected time for grade level teams to meet as professional learning teams, as well as "What I Need" (WIN) Time during the school day. During WIN Time first instruction pauses and all students get what they need, whether that be a pull-out intervention or extension, an extra reading or math small group with a grade level teacher, or social-emotional supports. This is one of the strategies we utilize to ensure high levels of learning for all students.
School Processes & Programs Strengths
Teacher teams work closely together to design instruction for their students. Teachers in grades 3-5 are departmentalized to allow teachers to become experts in 1-2 content areas. Rummel Creek is a destination campus for both new and veteran teachers, which gives us the benefit of having a rich pool of highly-qualified applicants for all open positions.
Problem Statements Identifying School Processes & Programs Needs
Problem Statement 1: Meeting the needs of all students is our collectively responsibility. Teacher teams must work collaboratively and creatively to meet the learning needs of all students at Rummel Creek. Root Cause: The health and safety guidelines associated with the COVID-19 pandemic during the 2020-2021 school year limited our teachers ability to share students across classrooms during WIN Time to ensure the learning needs of all students were met. Teachers are planning for ways to maximize this time in the 2021-2022 school year.
Problem Statement 2: Considering the high achievement level of students at Rummel Creek, the percentage of students achieving "masters" level on STAAR math has declined over the past few years. Root Cause: While teachers have multiple resources, a rich understanding of their grade level content and interventions, and multiple layers of support for language arts instruction, there are fewer resources and supports in math.
Problem Statement 3: English learners and students receiving special education services are performing at rates lower than other student populations. Root Cause: Teachers need additional training on how to support and intervene for English language learners and students receiving special education services.
Problem Statement 4: Professional Learning Communities must be committed to continuous cycles of improvement to improve student outcomes. Root Cause: Rummel Creek is in the initiating and implementing stages of our PLC journey.
Perceptions
Comprehensive Needs Assessment
Perceptions
Perceptions Summary
Rummel Creek is known for having a warm and welcoming atmosphere. Even though community access to campus was severly limited during the 2020-2021 school year, due to the COVID-19 pandemic, students reported feeling nurtured and cared for on campus. Teachers, staff, and administrators worked hard to reach families through other measures such as virtual meetings, phone calls, and emails. While not the same and in-person interactions, RCE staff worked hard to help families continue to feel connected to our school. Students, teachers, staff, and parents report feeling a family atmosphere when entering school grounds. We have a highly professional staff at RCE. Overall, the staff is positive and hard working. We have many different assessments and surveys to help drive our instruction and meet students' needs. This year, we will continue administering the MAP test which provides us with student growth data three times per school year in Reading and Math. The strong majority of staff, parents, and students report feeling that the school holds rigorous expectations and there is a focus on core values and safety.
Perceptions Strengths
Rummel Creek has a very positive reputation within the community and district. There are many second-generation families currently attending RCE, and there are even several RCE alumni that now work on the campus. Students and parents report feeling supported by the staff on campus, and the perception data around communication is very favorable.
Problem Statements Identifying Perceptions Needs
Problem Statement 1: While our community is highly involved on our campus, for many parents this involvement is focused around events or performances, rather than instruction and/or learning. Root Cause: Due to the COVID-19 pandemic visitors and volunteers were removed from the school building for more than a year. During the 2021-2022 school year we were so excited to welcome them back in and get back to "normal," but were not intentional about planning events that focused on learning.
Data Documentation
Comprehensive Needs Assessment Data Documentation
The following data were used to verify the comprehensive needs assessment analysis:
Improvement Planning Data
- District goals
- Campus goals
- HB3 CCMR goals
- Performance Objectives with summative review (prior year)
- Campus/District improvement plans (current and prior years)
- State and federal planning requirements
- Covid-19 Factors and/or waivers
Accountability Data
- Texas Academic Performance Report (TAPR) data
- Student Achievement Domain
- Student Progress Domain
- Closing the Gaps Domain
- Community Based Accountability System (CBAS)
Student Data: Assessments
- State and federally required assessment information
- (STAAR) current and longitudinal results, including all versions
- Texas English Language Proficiency Assessment System (TELPAS) and TELPAS Alternate results
- Student Success Initiative (SSI) data for Grades 5 and 8
- Local benchmark or common assessments data
- Running Records results
- Texas approved PreK - 2nd grade assessment data
Student Data: Student Groups
- Race and ethnicity data, including number of students, academic achievement, discipline, attendance, and progress
- Special programs data, including number of students, academic achievement, discipline, attendance, and progress
- Economically Disadvantaged / Non-economically disadvantaged performance, progress, and participation data
- Male / Female performance, progress, and participation data
- Special education/non-special education population including discipline, progress and participation data
- At-risk/non-at-risk population including performance, progress, discipline, attendance, and mobility data
- EL/non-EL or LEP data, including academic achievement, progress, support and accommodation needs, race, ethnicity, gender, etc.
- Section 504 data
- Homeless data
- Gifted and talented data
- Dyslexia Data
- Response to Intervention (RtI) student achievement data
Student Data: Behavior and Other Indicators
- Attendance data
- Mobility rate, including longitudinal data
- Discipline records
- Student surveys and/or other feedback
- Class size averages by grade and subject
- School safety data
Employee Data
- Professional learning communities (PLC) data
- Staff surveys and/or other feedback
- Teacher/Student Ratio
- State certified and high quality staff data
- Campus leadership data
- Campus department and/or faculty meeting discussions and data
- Professional development needs assessment data
- Evaluation(s) of professional development implementation and impact
Parent/Community Data
- Parent surveys and/or other feedback
- Parent engagement rate
- Community surveys and/or other feedback
Support Systems and Other Data
- Organizational structure data
- Processes and procedures for teaching and learning, including program implementation
- Communications data
- Budgets/entitlements and expenditures data
Goal 1: Student Achievement
Student Achievement
- Performance Objective 1 - ACHIEVEMENT
- Performance Objective 2 - EARLY LITERACY
- Performance Objective 3 - STUDENT GROWTH (PRIMARY GRADES)
- Performance Objective 4 - STUDENT GROWTH (INTERMEDIATE GRADES)
- Performance Objective 5 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ACQUISITION PROGRESS
Performance Objective 1 - ACHIEVEMENT
Goals
Goal 1: STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT. Every Rummel Creek Elementary School student will master rigorous academic standards to ensure college and career readiness.
Performance Objective 1: ACHIEVEMENT: By June 2023, Rummel Creek Elementary School will increase student performance on STAAR Grades 3-5 exams in reading and math by at least 3 points at each performance level (approaches, meets, masters).
2021-22: Reading: 94% (approaches), 85% (meets), 64% (masters); Math: 95% (approaches), 80% (meets), 55% (masters)
2020-21: Reading: 95% (approaches), 78% (meets), 51% (masters); Math: 96% (approaches), 85% (meets), 63% (masters)
Evaluation Data Sources: State Accountability Report Domain 1 (available mid- August)
Strategy 1: During August professional learning teachers will look closely at data from the 2020-2021 school year, including STAAR, MAP, and Running Record data with their grade level and vertical teams to strategically plan for instruction at the start of the school year. Strategy's Expected Result/Impact: More effective PLC functioning, improved academic outcomes for students Staff Responsible for Monitoring: Principal, Assistant Principals, Interventionists, Classroom Teachers Funding Sources: Instructional resources and supplies - 199 PIC 99 - Undistributed - $1,840, Instructional resources and supplies - 199 PIC 24 - At Risk - $820 |
Strategy 2: At the start of the school year, teachers will identify essential standards for their grade level, guided by the support of district specialists and administration, as well as feedback from the grade level teams above and below them. Strategy's Expected Result/Impact: A more focused and streamlined curriculum and more effective closing of post- COVID learning gaps Staff Responsible for Monitoring: Principal, Assistant Principals, Instructional Specialists, Classroom Teachers Funding Sources: substitutes to provide planning time for teachers - 282 ARP21 (ESSER III Campus Allocations) - $20,000, Materials to support teacher planning - 199 PIC 11 - Instructional Services - $2,500 |
Strategy 3: During a specified daily protected time, RCE teachers and specialists will provide Tier II or III instruction to students according to their needs without sacrificing crucial Tier I instructional time. Teachers will determine student needs during weekly PLC discussions. Strategy's Expected Result/Impact: Increased academic performance of all students Staff Responsible for Monitoring: Principal, Assistant Principals, Instructional Specialists, Interventionists, Classroom Teachers Funding Sources: Instructional materials such as TCRWP consumables - 199 PIC 99 - Undistributed - $3,000 |
Strategy 4: Teachers will meet weekly as a PLC to review instructional data, plan common assessments, and determine student needs with the support of administration and instructional specialists. Strategy's Expected Result/Impact: Increased academic performance of all students Staff Responsible for Monitoring: Principal, Assistant Principals, Interventionists, Classroom Teachers Funding Sources: TCRWP Consumable Materials and Math resources - 199 PIC 99 - Undistributed - $3,000 |
Performance Objective 2 - EARLY LITERACY
Goals
Goal 2: EARLY LITERACY: By June 2023, Rummel Creek Elementary School will increase the combined % of students reading On Grade Level or Above Grade Level on the End-of-Year Running Records assessment in each primary grade, K, 1, and 2, by 2 percentage points or ≥ to 85%.
2021-22: Kindergarten 91% On/Above Grade Level; 1st Grade: 92% On/Above Grade Level; 2nd Grade: 81% On/Above Grade Level
2020-21: Kindergarten 98% On/Above Grade Level; 1st Grade: 87% On/Above Grade Level; 2nd Grade: 92% On/Above Grade Level
Evaluation Data Sources: Running Records End-of-Year Report
Summative Evaluation: None
Strategy 1: Provide additional training to teachers in grades K, 1, and 2 on the implementation of effective strategies for small group instruction. Strategy's Expected Result/Impact: Increase the percentage of students reading on grade level by the end of 2nd grade. Staff Responsible for Monitoring: Principal, Assistant Principals, Interventionists, Instructional Specialists, Teachers Funding Sources: Substitute teachers to allow time for teachers to attend professional learning - 199 PIC 11 - Instructional Services - $8,000, Materials for teachers to utilize during professional learning and in classrooms - 199 PIC 99 - Undistributed - $1,200 |
Strategy 2: During a specified daily protected time, RCE teachers and specialists will provide Tier II or III instruction to students according to their needs without sacrificing crucial Tier I instructional time. Teachers will determine student needs during weekly PLC discussions. Strategy's Expected Result/Impact: Increased academic performance of all students Staff Responsible for Monitoring: Principal, Assistant Principals, Instructional Specialists, Interventionists, Classroom Teachers |
Strategy 3: Teachers will meet weekly as a PLC to review instructional data, plan common assessments, and determine student needs with the support of administration and instructional specialists. Strategy's Expected Result/Impact: Increased academic performance of all students Staff Responsible for Monitoring: Principal, Assistant Principals, Interventionists, Classroom Teachers |
Strategy 4: Utilize interventionists, dedicated substitutes, teacher assistants, and volunteers to help teachers ensure all students are getting individualized and/or small group instruction several times each week at their instructional level. Strategy's Expected Result/Impact: At least one year's growth for all readers in grades K, 1, and 2. Staff Responsible for Monitoring: Principal, Assistant Principals, Interventionists, Teachers |
Strategy 5: Grade level teams and vertical teams will meet twice per year to identify essential standards, create common assessments, review data, and plan for intervention/extension. Strategy's Expected Result/Impact: At least one year's worth of growth for all students. Staff Responsible for Monitoring: Teachers, Interventionists, Assistant Principals, Principal Funding Sources: Substitutes for planning days - 199 PIC 11 - Instructional Services - $4,000, Substitutes for planning days - 282 ARP21 (ESSER III Campus Allocations) - $10,000 |
Strategy 6: Provide time for Kindergarten and 1st grade teachers to assess and intervene for striving readers. Strategy's Expected Result/Impact: All students will end the year on or above grade level in reading. Funding Sources: Substitutes to allow teachers time to work 1:1 with students for assessment and intervention - 199 PIC 11 - Instructional Services - $3,000, Resources to support 1:1 and small group instruction for striving readers - 282 ARP21 (ESSER III Campus Allocations) - $10,000 |
Performance Objective 3 - STUDENT GROWTH (PRIMARY GRADES)
Goals
Goal 1: STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT. Every Rummel Creek Elementary School student will master rigorous academic standards to ensure college and career readiness.
Performance Objective 3: STUDENT GROWTH (PRIMARY GRADES): By June 2023, Rummel Creek Elementary School will increase the % of students demonstrating progress in reading and math by 5% points or ≥ to 85%.
2021-22: Reading - 50% met CGI; Math - 59% met CGI (Baseline Year)
Evaluation Data Sources: BOY to EOY Measures of Academic Progress (MAP) Reports Grades 1 and 2
Strategy 1: Following the administration of the BOY and MOY MAP assessments, teachers will review Reading and Math data with their grade level PLCs and develop a plan to address student needs. Strategy 2: Language arts teachers will utilize the Teacher's College curriculum and periodic running records to ensure that all students achieve literacy learning targets. Strategy 3: Provide additional training for all classroom teachers on the reports and resources available within the NWEA MAP program to ensure they are monitoring student progress toward meeting CGI. |
Performance Objective 4 - STUDENT GROWTH (INTERMEDIATE GRADES)
Goals
Goal 1: STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT. Every Rummel Creek Elementary School student will master rigorous academic standards to ensure college and career readiness.
Performance Objective 4: STUDENT GROWTH (INTERMEDIATE GRADES): By June 2023, Rummel Creek Elementary School will increase the % of students demonstrating progress in reading and math by 5% points or more on MOY MAP and by 5% points year over year on STAAR Progress.
2021-22: Reading - 57% met CGI; Math - 51% met CGI; 84% of STAAR Progress (Baseline Year)
Evaluation Data Sources: BOY to MOY MAP Reports Grades 3-5 Year over year STAAR progress Grades 4 and 5 (Campus Accountability Report, Domain 2A component score available in August)
Strategy 1: Small group instruction will be a campus-wide expectation in reading, writing, and math daily this year. We will utilize interventionists, resource teachers, and dedicated substitutes to increase the opportunity for all students to participate in small groups as often as feasible.
Strategy's Expected Result/Impact: We will see increases student growth across all achievement levels, ensuring even our highest achieving students are challenged.
Staff Responsible for Monitoring: Principal, assistant principals, interventionists, guiding coalition, teachers.
Funding Sources: Materials to support small group instruction. - 199 PIC 11 - Instructional Services - $8,000, Resources to support small group instruction - 282 ARP21 (ESSER III Campus Allocations) - $15,000
Performance Objective 5 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ACQUISITION PROGRESS
Goals
Goal 1: STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT. Every Rummel Creek Elementary School student will master rigorous academic standards to ensure college and career readiness.
Performance Objective 5: ENGLISH LANGUAGE ACQUISITION PROGRESS: By June 2023, the rate of English Learners increasing at least one Composite Score level will increase by 5 percentage points or ≥ 80%.
2021-22: TELPAS Progress Rate 64% (Based on completed TELPAS administrations in both 2021 and 2022.)
Evaluation Data Sources: State Accountability Report Domain 3
Summative Evaluation: None
Strategy 1: Teachers and ESL paraprofessional will collaborate around data for English Learners to provide targeted small group instruction to each student. Strategy's Expected Result/Impact: The percentage of English Learners reclassifying will increase. Staff Responsible for Monitoring: Principal, Assistant Principals, ESL Paraprofessionals, Teachers Funding Sources: Resources for targeted small group instruction for English Learners - 199 PIC 25 - ESL/Bilingual - $1,000 |
Strategy 2: Utilize interventionists, dedicated substitutes, teacher assistants, and volunteers to help teachers ensure all EL students are getting individualized and/or small group instruction several times each week at their instructional level. Strategy's Expected Result/Impact: Increased academic performance of all EL students. Staff Responsible for Monitoring: Principal, Assistant Principal, Interventionists, Classroom Teachers, Teacher Assistants Funding Sources: Substitute Teachers to allow time for additional intervention for EL students - 199 PIC 11 - Instructional Services - $2,000 |
Goal 2: Student Support
Student Support
- Performance Objective 1 - INTERVENTIONS
- Performance Objective 2 - CORE CHARACTERISTICS IF A T-2-4 READY GRADUATE
Performance Objective 1 - INTERVENTIONS
Goals
Goal 2: STUDENT SUPPORT. Every Rummel Creek Elementary School student will benefit from an aligned system that supports his/her academic and social-emotional needs.
Performance Objective 1: INTERVENTIONS: By June 2023, Rummel Creek Elementary School will implement TIER II interventions with students identified as needing additional supports in reading and/or math.
Evaluation Data Sources: PK-CIRCLE Assessment, Kinder-TX-KEA, Grades 1-5-MAP
Strategy 1: Interventionists will take ownership of the SSC/RTI process on campus, leading teams through the data analysis and goal setting process. Strategies and a timeline will be developed collectively, including identifying ownership of each aspect of the plan, and teams will meet back regularly to monitor student progress and determine next steps. Strategy's Expected Result/Impact: By having interventionists and teachers working collectively to own the SSC/RTI process, rather than the assistant principals, the decisions will be made by those doing the work. This will result in more growth for students and increased collective teacher efficacy. Staff Responsible for Monitoring: Interventionists, guiding coalition, teachers, assistant principals, principal Funding Sources: Training for Interventionists on RTI processes - 282 ARP21 (ESSER III Campus Allocations) - $2,000, Training for Interventionists and teachers - 199 PIC 24 - At Risk - $120, Training for Interventionists and teachers - 199 PIC 25 - ESL/Bilingual - $1,000, Resources and training to support students receiving special education services - 199 PIC 23 - Special Education - $150 |
Performance Objective 2 - CORE CHARACTERISTICS IF A T-2-4 READY GRADUATE
Goals
Goal 2: STUDENT SUPPORT. Every Rummel Creek Elementary School student will benefit from an aligned system that supports his/her academic and social-emotional needs.
Performance Objective 2: CORE CHARACTERISTICS OF A T-2-4 READY GRADUATE: By June 2023, Rummel Creek Elementary School will implement at least three strategies that advance the focus on Core Characteristics for every child.
Evaluation Data Sources: Campus calendar and newsletters
Strategy 1: Rummel Creek staff will use a common language to support students' academic and social-emotional needs across the campus. This will ensure students are Academically Prepared, Ethical and Service Minded, Empathetic and SelfAware, and strong Communicators and Collaborators. Strategy's Expected Result/Impact: Students will understand the Core Characteristics and will hear staff across the campus using common language to support that understanding. Strategy 2: Purposefully teach and model effective study habits and time management skills. Protect time for students to practice these skills. Strategy 3: In order to increase evidence that our students are Persistent and Adaptable, teachers and other school staff will model giving and receiving feedback, as well as learning from making mistakes. |
Goal 3: Safe Schools
Safe Schools
- Performance Objective 1 - SAFE SCHOOL ENVIRONMENT
- Performance Objective 2 - SAFETY COMMITTEE
- Performance Objective 3 - EMERGENCY OPERATIONS
Performance Objective 1 - SAFE SCHOOL ENVIRONMENT
Goal 3: SAFE SCHOOLS. Strengthen school safety by establishing and conducting Campus Safety Committee reviews throughout the school year.
Performance Objective 1: SAFE SCHOOL ENVIRONMENT: Align academic, behavior, and discipline systems to support a safe campus culture and maximize student learning.
Evaluation Data Sources: Discipline Data Dashboard, Review effectiveness of Behavior Intervention Plans
Strategy 1: Rummel Creek staff will use a common language to support students' academic and social-emotional needs across the campus. Teacher will use the discipline management plan to address behavior and/or discipline concerns.
Strategy's Expected Result/Impact: Students will hear staff across the campus using common language that supports a safe campus culture and maximizes student learning.
Staff Responsible for Monitoring: Principal, Assistant Principals, Teachers, Guiding Coalition.
Funding Sources: Resources and materials to assist in communication of collective expectations - 199 PIC 99 - Undistributed - $2,000
Performance Objective 2 - SAFETY COMMITTEE
Goals
Goal 3: SAFE SCHOOLS. Strengthen school safety by establishing and conducting Campus Safety Committee reviews throughout the school year.
Performance Objective 2: SAFETY COMMITTEE: Strengthen school safety by establishing and conducting Campus Safety Committee reviews throughout the school year.
Evaluation Data Sources: Campus Safety Committee roster
Summative Evaluation: None
Strategy 1: CAMPUS SAFETY COMMITTEE: Establish Campus Safety Committees composed of a cross section of stakeholders to look at matters related to campus safety. Strategy's Expected Result/Impact: Each Campus principal will recruit a safety team and provide a roster. Each campus team will meet three times per year so that all campuses will be able to refine safety practices. Staff Responsible for Monitoring: Administrators |
Strategy 2: HARRIS COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION: Participate in the Harris County Department of Education (HCDE) campus safety audit. Strategy's Expected Result/Impact: Campus will develop action plans to address any deficiencies as a result of safety audits. Staff Responsible for Monitoring: Administrators, Safety Committee |
Performance Objective 3 - EMERGENCY OPERATIONS
Goals
Goal 3: SAFE SCHOOLS. Strengthen school safety by establishing and conducting Campus Safety Committee reviews throughout the school year.
Performance Objective 3: EMERGENCY OPERATIONS: Develop Campus Emergency Operations Procedures (EOP) that comply with SB 11, and include Standard Operating Procedures.
Evaluation Data Sources: Campus Emergency Operation Procedures Documents
Summative Evaluation: None
Strategy 1: EMERGENCY OPERATIONS PROCEDURES: Campus EOP will align to the best practices from the Texas School Safety Center and the Standard Operating Procedures, such as the "I Love You Guys" Foundation. Strategy's Expected Result/Impact: Campus EOP is turned in and filed by September 1st. Staff Responsible for Monitoring: Administrators |
Strategy 2: EMERGENCY OPERATIONS PROCEDURES: Update campus EOP annually and train staff at the start of each school year. Strategy's Expected Result/Impact: Campus procedures maintained in campus EOPs. Staff training documents maintained. EOP submitted by September 1st. Staff Responsible for Monitoring: Administrators, Safety Committee |
Goal 4: Fiscal Responsibility
Fiscal Responsibility
Performance Objective 1 - FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT
Goals
Goal 4: FISCAL RESPONSIBILITY. Rummel Creek Elementary School will ensure efficient and effective fiscal management of resources and operations to maximize learning for all students.
Performance Objective 1: FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT: Maintain high quality financial management practices so that financial resources provide the maximum possible support for T-2-4.
Evaluation Data Sources: Year-To-Date (YTD) Budget Reports (monthly, quarterly, annually)
Strategy 1: Conduct frequent budget meetings with Administrative Assistant to review and manage money. Strategy's Expected Result/Impact: Error free records. Documentation of purchases and orders. Staff Responsible for Monitoring: Principal, Administrative Assistant |
Campus Funding Summary
Campus Funding Summary
199 PIC 11 - Instructional Services | ||||
Goal | Objective | Strategy | Resources Needed | Amount |
1 | 1 | 2 | Materials to support teacher planning | $2,500.00 |
1 | 2 | 1 | Substitute teachers to allow time for teachers to attend professional learning | $8,000.00 |
1 | 1 | 4 | Resources to support small group instruction | $1,885.00 |
1 | 2 | 5 | Substitutes for planning days | $4,000.00 |
1 | 2 | 6 | Substitutes to allow teachers time to work 1:1 with students for assessment and intervention |
$3,000.00 |
1 | 2 | 1 | Substitutes to allow teachers to attend professional learning to address individual student needs through small group instruction. | $3,400.00 |
1 | 3 | 2 | Substitutes to allow teachers to attend professional learning and planning sessions |
$2,000.00 |
1 | 3 | 3 | Substitutes for language arts teachers to analyze data and plan for instruction | $735.00 |
1 | 4 | 1 | Substitute Teachers to allow time for additional intervention for EL students | $8,000.00 |
1 | 5 | 2 | Substitutes for interventionists to facilitate and coordinate GT and CBE testing | $2,000.00 |
2 | 2 | 3 | classroom materials to support goal setting and tracking with students | $4,000.00 |
Sub-Total | $39,520.00 | |||
Budgeted Fund Source Amount | $39,520.00 | |||
+/- Difference | $0.00 |
199 PIC 23 - Special Education | ||||
Goal | Objective | Strategy | Resources Needed | Amount |
1 | 3 | 1 | Targeted intervention resources for students receiving special education services | $1,410.00 |
2 | 1 | 1 | Resources and training to support students receiving special education services | $150.00 |
Sub-Total | $1,560.00 | |||
Budgeted Fund Source Amount | $1,560.00 | |||
+/- Difference | $0.00 |
199 PIC 24 - At Risk | ||||
Goal | Objective | Strategy | Resources Needed | Amount |
1 | 1 | 1 | Instructional resources and supplies | $820.00 |
2 | 1 | 1 | Training for Interventionists and teachers | $120.00 |
Sub-Total | $940.00 | |||
Budgeted Fund Source Amount | $940.00 | |||
+/- Difference | $0.00 |
199 PIC 25 - ESL/Bilingual | ||||
Goal | Objective | Strategy | Resources Needed | Amount |
1 | 3 | 1 | Consumables for ESL intervention | $1,000.00 |
1 | 3 | 2 | Consumable resources for ESL intervention | $380.00 |
1 | 5 | 1 | Resources for targeted small group instruction for English Learners | $1,000.00 |
Sub-Total | $2,380.00 | |||
Budgeted Fund Source Amount | $2,380.00 | |||
+/- Difference | $0.00 |
199 PIC 99 - Undistributed | ||||
Goal | Objective | Strategy | Resources Needed | Amount |
1 | 1 | 1 | Instructional resources and supplies | $1,840.00 |
1 | 1 | 3 | Instructional materials such as TCRWP consumables | $3,000.00 |
1 | 1 | 4 | TCRWP Consumable Materials and Math resources | $3,000.00 |
1 | 2 | 1 | Materials for teachers to utilize during professional learning and in classrooms | $1,200.00 |
1 | 4 | 1 | Resources for teachers to utilize during small group instruction in reading and math. |
$1,000.00 |
1 | 4 | 2 | TC resources to be utilized during instruction | $1,520.00 |
2 | 1 | 1 | Posters & consumables for guidance lessons | $2,000.00 |
2 | 2 | 1 | Consumable resources for guidance lessons | $2,000.00 |
3 | 3 | 1 | PPE (hand sanitizer, sanitizing wipes, masks, etc) | $2,000.00 |
Sub-Total | $19,560.00 | |||
Budgeted Fund Source Amount | $19,560.00 | |||
+/- Difference | $0.00 | |||
Grand Total | $147,460.00 |